I heard a Native American saying which totally
applied to me in my journey in education and it was “Tell me and I'll forget. Show me, and I may not
remember. Involve me, and I'll understand”. This is exactly what we need
in education to make students more involved in learning to understand
effectively.
1994 was the first year
in my long journey in education. 19 years went till now and the end is not
known until I decide to end up it. Going specifically in my journey to the
sciences classes that I passed by through it, I found myself entering the
intermediate level that begun at 2002 when I reached grade 7. This grade was
the beginning of my suffering with some of these subjects which were biology,
chemistry, physics, and mathematics. In reality my memory is not refresh to
remember exactly what happened inside the classes but there were some things
that happened and affected me negatively or positively. By going generally into
my intermediate level, I didn’t remember that it was effective as it should
especially because it was the basis for me in physics and chemistry. These two
subjects were very new for me and I faced a lot of problems in understanding
them correctly. Although these two subjects need concrete materials and a lot
of examples to be understood and to stick in our minds, but I didn’t remember
any of these happened in any of my intermediate classes. This affected my
achievement very negatively because all what I remembered from this level was
the protest that my classmates did because we were not understanding chemistry;
also I didn’t remember anything because nothing stuck on my mind. It was not a
very good experience to me since I had a problem in understanding new
information if I didn’t experience or at least observe them and this was not
found in my school, for this reason nothing stuck in my mind till now and I
felt shame when my sister asked my about anything in chemistry or biology and I
forgot the answer. All this happened because of their unclear way in explaining
or their methods in teaching which was mainly lecturing all the time.
After passing the
intermediate classes successfully, I entered my secondary level which was
totally different in terms of the school, friends, and teachers. I would like
to start with math which is my major, till now I still remember the teacher who
taught me and how it’s way in explaining made me like the subject, understand
it, and decide to choose it as my major. This teacher taught me for three years
continuously, although in the first year he didn’t try to build any
relationship with us and he was irritable but his way in teaching and assessing
was very effective. He used to explain everything very clearly by giving a lot
of examples and by trying to make every one participate in his period. Another
thing was that after each lesson or two lessons we had a small exam to evaluate
our understanding. His performance or methods were always developing even his
relationship with us changed by time and became more smoothly; for these
reasons year after year mathematics became my favorite subject especially
because he taught me three years continuously. On other hand there was the
biology and the same thing according to the teacher since he taught me for
three years continuously too. This teacher was somehow different than the math
teacher; his way in teaching and in dealing with us didn’t change all over the
three years. He was either lecturing or writing and we were just copying.
Although I was understanding biology but I never took a high grade even when I
felt that I did perfect, and what also affected me that all these three years
we did only one experiment at the class which was on blood types, but really
till now I remember every single step we did, that lesson was very effective to
me. But because this subject is full of interpreting, explaining, or in other
word it is full of experiments and we didn’t observe any real one I ended up
with thoughts that I understand this subject fully while the reality was the
opposite, and what happened to me at the official exams was really very shocked
and made me hate biology and made me change what I was planning for in my
college education. That day I finished my exam with a very happy heart and face
because I thought that I did very well in my exam but what was shocking that I
failed in the biology exam, I felt very disappointed and I was planning to
enter nursing but after what happened I hated biology and I change all my future
plan. I don’t think that the problem was just in me but also was in the
teacher’s ways and the teaching strategies he used which was only rote
learning.
Now, I will move to
another subject that I really suffered from in my secondary level which was chemistry
or maybe I was suffering from the chemistry teacher mainly. He taught me in the
first and third secondary and he affected me very negatively because instead of
liking chemistry I hate it. This teacher had no teaching methods, no classroom
management, and no content knowledge, I were suffering at his classes because I
didn’t understand this subject, he easily got lost in any question we asked him
about and also w never go to the lab to observe things which made the subject
very dry and meaningless. His way was always unclear and when he started to
explain on the board we found him confused or carrying his copy book just
copying from it, these things weakness our trust on him. Always when I entered
his class I felt angry because everyone was talking, a lot of chaos found
really his classes was as a beehive. These factors affected my understanding
and my achievement for this subject. But what happened that at my second
secondary class a different teacher taught me, he was totally different from
the previous teacher. That year was different for me I started to like
chemistry, understand it, and participate at its classes. This teacher had very
effective teaching strategy and he explained the ideas very clearly, also he
tried to take us to the lab several times to observe some experiments like
titration. Although we were just observed but it affected my understanding
positively because until now I still remember the instruments and some steps
the teacher did, that year was the only year in my secondary education that I
liked this subject and I understood it.
The last subject was
physics which till now I hate it and I found a lot of difficulties
understanding it may be because the same teacher who taught me in the school
also taught me the physics courses at the university. To be honest and fair
this teacher has a very nice personality and deal with us very politely with a
lot of respect but the problem was that he didn’t has an effective way to
transform the big quantity of information he had. This caused me a lot of
problems to understand this subject and apply it to my life especially because
we didn’t experience any information, they were just something abstract to me and
unfortunately the same teacher also taught me most of the physics courses at
the university.
After putting a lot of effort and studying
I finished my secondary education successfully. I registered mathematics based
on my experience with sciences, so I found myself more comfortable and willing
to enter this domain because I found myself in it. My experience at the
university was different than school because at the university the
relationships was too much less among students and between students and the
teacher. At the university we entered the class finding the teacher only lecturing
his subject with some participation. Some courses had solving exercises
sessions per week while a lot of other courses didn’t had and we had to satisfy
with what was taken at the class at the beginning it was hard for me but with
time I got used and I changed my way of studying to keep succeeding.
Now I finished my BS in
math and I decided to complete my teaching diploma instead of making masters in
math because I felt that it will help me more in my domain later on. But my
journey will not stop after I finished my diploma unless I decide to stop it
here.
Finally, there is a
saying which I like for John
Ruskin said: The true end of education is
not only to make the young learned, but to make them love learning; not only to
make them industrious, but to make them love industry; not only to make them
virtuous, but to make them love virtue; not only to make them just, but to make
them hunger and thirst after justice. After
I read this quote I stop for a minute and I start thinking: Is my journey has a
really true end? And
I found that the answer is unfortunately no. My real job as a future teacher
exists here because it will be to try my best to teach my students in a way that
will contribute in making their end true.

No comments:
Post a Comment